Slyck.com
 
Slyck Chatbox - And More

Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discussion

For discussion of the threatened legal action surrounding the alleged filesharing of pornography, computer games and music. (Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK)
Forum rules
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Slyck Forum Rules

Welcome to this forum, should you have received a letter do not panic, read the threads and make a (hopefully more informed) decision on how you want to proceed.

To avoid repeating previous posts, please familiarise yourself with the following information before posting.

Summary site (BeingThreatened.com) and Chat (IRC) or Chat (WebClient)

Speculative invoicing and “pay up or else” schemes for copyright infringement - Citizen's Advice Bureau

Speculative Invoicing Handbook

I've received a letter, what should I do? and Davenport Lyons - What can we do as a group?

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby bpaw » Fri Mar 08, 2019 4:07 pm

Hi Alice again! Very good advice, and thanks for re-linking to a previous post of mine. Grammar isn’t important if the advice is understood. I think you achieved that.

A bit of clarity is needed from myself, and I apologise if I may have mislead or misinformed observers from the points I have made.

From what I have seen and articles read, the letters are worded in a way to suggest that TCYK are targeting those who didn’t initially respond to their first letter. The letter states “Your response was never received”.

Those who have sent copies of their letter, which I thank again for those who did for doing so, show a consistency in this. I am very reluctant to post on here any detail of the letters unless there is an exact part that is in all of them I see.

The crux of this from the TCYK letter is they are going by the assertion that the recipient did not respond to their first letter of claim. By this, TCYK are putting the recipient of the letter into a position of them thinking that TCYK are returning to them near the end of TCYK’s ability to issue Court claim proceedings on the basis that TCYK did not receive a response to their initial letter of claim.

Now from the multitude of correspondence I have had with those who recently received letters of claim from TCYK, I can see that there are some who did respond to TCYK from their first letter of claim, even though TCYK claim that the recipient didn’t reply.

Here’s the problem. Going by the advice on this thread on this forum, it is always said to reply to these copyright trolls with a posted letter recorded delivery so you can have proof of TCYK receiving your response. Telephone calls can’t be proved unless you record them, and emails can be proven to be sent, but can’t be proven they were read by the recipient. A signed for letter which the sender receives a proven delivery is proof.

What was never given on this thread is keeping the proof for six years. It has been said on this forum that the statute of limitations for such a civil claim is six years, but keeping the proof for a potential Court case is obviously very unlikely when you really believe that the matter is closed.

I don’t have all the understanding of every situation, but I have one particular thought. The imperative from everyone is to have the proof that you denied their claim, and you have the proof that TCYK received that. This is a five year old allegation, so how many recipients still hold that proof? Did TCYK factor that in their latest claim? They probably did.

There is a certain amount of expense and risk involved in TCYK doing what they recently did with sending these letters out. Make no mistake that Robert Edwin Croucher, even though a convicted thug, and especially being a convicted thug, no doubt has put his well-educated (And lack of real-world experienced) mind into this for the purpose of his claim of copyright protection which is copyright extortion.

Not everyone is in the same situation, and MrMike I would say in your situation being in someone else’s name could be for any reason we don’t know. I will say do not post any detail of this on this thread. If what I have mentioned now has given you good advice to respond or not so then good. If you are still unsure, then PM me with a bit more detail, and I will try to advise.

BTW, I thank those again who provided copied of their letters and corresponded with me, and I may have a sneaky suspicion that one of the letters may have been graciously provided by a (c) troll.

Maybe not!
"Hatton & Berkeley, which provides financial services to small businesses, sent the letters on behalf of its client TCYK LLC to Mrs Drew. Robert Croucher, managing director of Hatton & Berkeley, said: "They [the letters] are part of what's referred to as a pre-action protocol. We send them before action...They don't actually make a demand for money."
Source Link: BBC News
bpaw
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: ACS:Law leaked spreadsheet

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby bpaw » Fri Mar 08, 2019 5:05 pm

On a separate note, and specifically aimed at TCYK or any other (c) troll, I/me/we are here for those who are innocent of your claim. Your claim is against an ISP subscriber. Someone who decided to put their name against paying a household bill. Just like someone who puts their name against paying a water/electric/gas etc bill.

Your claim also relies on the ISP subscriber who knows they didn't commit your ALLEGED infringement to name those who may have used their internet connection. In a sense of your ALLEGED claim, this could be those in the same household, or any visitor who was granted use of a WiFi connection that is linked to the ISP subscribers internet connection.

I personally believe that the BitTorrent monitors have a mechanism that is fundamentally flawed. Time and time again their monitoring software which captures so many IP addresses can only be matched to an actual ISP subscriber by an average accuracy of 33%. So basically, for every three IP addresses monitored by these so called "Expert witnesses", one of these IP addresses is able to be linked to an ISP subscriber.

It's an inherent flaw.

So excuse me for being biased against you, you copyright trolls.

One thing I am not is an excuser of pirates. I don't give advice to those who say they are guilty. I don't believe that those who download copyright material would pay for it, so I don't believe the claim from copyright trolls that every download is a lost sale. For from it. That is my belief, but not my advice to those who contact me for help.

I believe, and I know from my own personal experience of receiving a letter from ACS:Law that innocent people have been and are being targeted by copyright trolls. Enough to know that I want to help those who are innocent.

I give advice under the assumption of what is told me. No one has ever asked me for advice and said they were guilty of the alleged offence.

I would never give anybody advice to deny the alleged infringement if they admitted to me that they did commit the infringement.

Am I bothered if those who did commit the infringement ask for my help when not admitting it to me? No. The "evidence" is one download, and their claim is sharing to the "swarm". Uh? Evidence? What evidence? Where's their evidence?

So, to TCKY or any copyright troll out there, this thread is for the innocents which you know about but still target.

Also, TCYK or other (c) trolls. Stop trying to catch me out.
"Hatton & Berkeley, which provides financial services to small businesses, sent the letters on behalf of its client TCYK LLC to Mrs Drew. Robert Croucher, managing director of Hatton & Berkeley, said: "They [the letters] are part of what's referred to as a pre-action protocol. We send them before action...They don't actually make a demand for money."
Source Link: BBC News
bpaw
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: ACS:Law leaked spreadsheet

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Darkstar » Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:57 pm

Yo guys. Just after a bit of advice.

So a few years back these clowns tried this crap on me. I found this website and followed the advice. I think it was back in 2017 maybe? Either way i had a chuckle about it.

Anyway, so i have moved house now, in fact i have moved out of the UK altogether, likely never to return (still in the EU, or at least will be until they sort Brexit out).

I follow this thread every few months just to see how things are going and noticed the mention of this 6 years after the alleged infringement concern.

So what should i do about pre planning against any crap they might try in the future? Should i not worry or shall i ensure that all possible things are done so that they can find my address abroad?

Personally i couldn't care less about their Mickey Mouse campaign since the alleged movie i apparently downloaded is allegedly available on any major tube site (no names mentioned).

The only 'evidence' they allegedly had on me was an IP address at a time when i was at work and no one was at home and the router was turned off (always turn it off if i am away on business and house is empty).

So yeah any precautions i need to take?
Darkstar
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:45 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Darkstar » Sun Mar 10, 2019 6:35 pm

Further to the above it was earlier than 2017 and was around 2015 i think. Shows how much i paid attention to caring. Similar to how much i cared about paying for a TV license when we didn't watch live TV and the BBC kept saying they would visit us every month for 8 years.
Darkstar
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:45 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Strawman » Wed Mar 13, 2019 3:59 am

You are under no obligation to make TCYK aware of your new address. Where their pre-action letters or claim form goes undelivered, the onus is on them to take steps to ascertain your current residence. They will almost certainly have no way of doing this unless you left a forwarding address.

Whilst the civil procedure rules do permit them in limited circumstances to use your original address as a 'last known address' for the purpose of service, the likelihood that the court will accept this, after the significant passage of time, is very low.

For TCYK to take reasonable steps to ascertain current residence seems a lot of work for little reward, and it is doubtful that they will have the appetite to do this for every single victim individually. That is not their business model.
Strawman
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2015 9:15 am

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Stressed_Out » Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:23 pm

Hi again everyone.

Been off the scene for quite a while and I know it's a bit late but I'd like to sincerely wish all on the forum
a very "Happy New Year" especially the newcomers. You have come to the right place.

You will find the advice on this "Scam" the very best there is to be had. Their knowledge is invaluable and broad in range.
What these guy's don't know about the "Scam" isn't worth knowing. They've tied knots in the "Scamsters" who profess to know all about fraudulently squeezing money out of vulnerable victims.

Please, if you're in the process of "Speculative Invoicing", take note of any and all advice given.

Remember "Don't give these "Scammers a penny"
Stressed_Out
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:19 am

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Stressed_Out » Wed Apr 03, 2019 12:56 pm

**Observation**

What with this and the ACS:Law,DL letter legal threat: thread if I'm not mistaken, they have attracted Circa 10,000,000 views.

Just goes to show the power of the internet used in a beneficial way for the world population as opposed to that of the corporations and "Scammers".

Take a step back and toast yourselves whoever you are. :toast: you deserve it with a special mention for those who have spent many hours supporting others. You all know who you are. :toast: I take my hat off to you.
Stressed_Out
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:19 am

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby MrFredPFL » Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:36 am

Stressed_Out wrote:**Observation**

What with this and the ACS:Law,DL letter legal threat: thread if I'm not mistaken, they have attracted Circa 10,000,000 views.

Just goes to show the power of the internet used in a beneficial way for the world population as opposed to that of the corporations and "Scammers".

Take a step back and toast yourselves whoever you are. :toast: you deserve it with a special mention for those who have spent many hours supporting others. You all know who you are. :toast: I take my hat off to you.


actually, the number is larger than that, i'm pretty sure. iirc, i had to manually reset the views count on one of the threads because the number became too large for the message board software to handle.

regardless, i second your comment, stressed. there are some real heroes here. let's hope that with the impending imprisonment of one of the participants in this kind of scam in the U.S., the tide is finally turning worldwide. better late than never - the courts need to put an end to this shameful practice wherever it happens. it's well past time for the people who pull these scams to be held to the same legal standard as everyone else.
User avatar
MrFredPFL
 
Posts: 15678
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:48 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Hickster » Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:57 am

@stressed_out
@MrFredPFL

Image

:toast: To ALL of you, and a SPECIAL mention to the Board Admins who have put up with me at least for the last nearly 10 Years. Thankyou
Please feel free to email me at:
acs.bore@gmail.com

Read the BLOG Here
http://acsbore.wordpress.com

Faceless Keyboard Warrior
User avatar
Hickster
Faceless Keyboard Warrior
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 2:25 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby bpaw » Fri Apr 19, 2019 7:30 pm

Twitter @RobertCroucher2

:lookup:
"Hatton & Berkeley, which provides financial services to small businesses, sent the letters on behalf of its client TCYK LLC to Mrs Drew. Robert Croucher, managing director of Hatton & Berkeley, said: "They [the letters] are part of what's referred to as a pre-action protocol. We send them before action...They don't actually make a demand for money."
Source Link: BBC News
bpaw
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: ACS:Law leaked spreadsheet

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby bpaw » Fri Jun 07, 2019 6:22 pm

https://www.hattonandberkeley.com/robert-croucher

His time is divided between overseeing the daily management of the operating group companies as well as consulting on venture capital requirements of clients.

Fair enough.
"Hatton & Berkeley, which provides financial services to small businesses, sent the letters on behalf of its client TCYK LLC to Mrs Drew. Robert Croucher, managing director of Hatton & Berkeley, said: "They [the letters] are part of what's referred to as a pre-action protocol. We send them before action...They don't actually make a demand for money."
Source Link: BBC News
bpaw
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: ACS:Law leaked spreadsheet

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Mullard47 » Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:19 pm

May I suggest that the following law report may be of interest.

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2019/1827.html
Mullard47
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 1:59 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby MrFredPFL » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:40 am

Mullard47 wrote:May I suggest that the following law report may be of interest.

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2019/1827.html


good stuff, mullard.

TorrentFreak has posted their writeup of this:

https://torrentfreak.com/high-court-sla ... rt-190718/

:)
User avatar
MrFredPFL
 
Posts: 15678
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:48 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby bpaw » Thu Jul 18, 2019 12:31 pm

Thanks Mullard and Fred, and thanks to Virgin for doing something Sky could never do and stand up to trolls.

ISP Review story HERE too.
"Hatton & Berkeley, which provides financial services to small businesses, sent the letters on behalf of its client TCYK LLC to Mrs Drew. Robert Croucher, managing director of Hatton & Berkeley, said: "They [the letters] are part of what's referred to as a pre-action protocol. We send them before action...They don't actually make a demand for money."
Source Link: BBC News
bpaw
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: ACS:Law leaked spreadsheet

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Appletree » Thu Jul 18, 2019 7:29 pm

Mullard47 wrote:May I suggest that the following law report may be of interest.

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2019/1827.html


Many thanks for the update. They seem to be targeting Virgin Media customers a lot. Why is that, coincidence? I wonder if Sky would have the decency to stand up for their customers in light of this decision.

Also, do we know which movie companies were listed here as claimants along with Mircom and Golden Eye?
Appletree
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 7:20 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby bpaw » Fri Jul 19, 2019 3:09 pm

The "Others" must be wary of Hickster to not be named. Simple.

I did wonder about the post GDPR next NPO.

In the Judgement:

[Virgin had no convincing answer to the Applicants' submission and I accept it. It follows that if the order is made, the Applicants would be "recipients" of personal data but not "controllers" thereof, and thus not subject to the more onerous obligations on "controllers". This conclusion is supported by the natural meaning of these words in any event.

I'm confused. I was under the impression under GDPR that someone is the data controller. If personal data, and private personal data is transferred between two parties then the "gatherer" of the data has ultimate responsibility. For a data controller to pass personal data on to a processor, they need a legal guarantee from the recipient that the personal data will be processed by the following principles:

•Lawfulness, fairness and transparency.
•Purpose limitation.
•Data minimisation.
•Accuracy.
•Storage limitation.
•Integrity and confidentiality (security)
•Accountability.

How are Virgin Media (Or any ISP) able to be satisfied with any guarantee of the above? With GEIL? What happened to ACS:Law!

Also, it's a grey area (As is the definition of GDPR!) of who is a data controller. Personal data gathered by an organisation makes the organisation the data controller. The data gathered by the data controller which is passed on to a recipient makes the recipient a data processor on behalf of the data controller. Any breach of personal data will require an investigation which will ultimately make any investigation by the ICO focus on who is to blame.

In a hypothetical situation of Virgin Media receiving a written and signed assurance from GEIL that GEIL have bullet proof security in processing personal data, then in the result of a data breach, GEIL would be liable.

What makes GDPR more confusing in this situation is from the ICO itself HERE:

•Understanding your role in relation to the personal data you are processing is crucial in ensuring compliance with the GDPR and the fair treatment of individuals.
•Your obligations under the GDPR will vary depending on whether you are a controller, joint controller or processor.
•The ICO has the power to take action against controllers and processors under the GDPR.
•Individuals can bring claims for compensation and damages against both controllers and processors.
•You should take the time to assess, and document, the status of each organisation you work with in respect of all the personal data and processing activities you carry out.
•Whether you are a controller or processor depends on a number of issues. The key question is – who determines the purposes for which the data are processed and the means of processing?
•Organisations that determine the purposes and means of processing will be controllers regardless of how they are described in any contract about processing services.

The "Organisations that determine the purposes and means of processing will be controllers regardless of how they are described in any contract about processing services" is one thing. Then under "Are we controllers?" is "We decided what the purpose or outcome of the processing was to be".

To me, GEIL would be controllers of personal data.

I think the Judge got it wrong with his judgement of GDPR, and any future NPO from any copyright holder can be challenged under GDPR.

Edit:
GEIL as recipients of disclosed ISP data would be the controllers of private personal data because it provides an individuals sexual preference. i.e. it's porn.
"Hatton & Berkeley, which provides financial services to small businesses, sent the letters on behalf of its client TCYK LLC to Mrs Drew. Robert Croucher, managing director of Hatton & Berkeley, said: "They [the letters] are part of what's referred to as a pre-action protocol. We send them before action...They don't actually make a demand for money."
Source Link: BBC News
bpaw
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: ACS:Law leaked spreadsheet

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Stressed_Out » Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:42 am

Hi again all.

What struck me while reading the court transcript was the way Recorder Campbell picked up on what has been pointed out on this thread since it began.

Not using the exact description and assessment of the professed skills of those concerned as used by forum members, his observations confirmed what has been said all along.
Without re-reading the transcript I believe his observations started with Julian, then went through all the applicants with less than favourable conclusions.
In fact it seems reasonable to assume that Recorder Campbell was implying that those involved in this lastest attempt to extort money via the legal process were as incompetent as those who came before, doesn't matter if they are legal council, expert witnesses, et.al.

Quite an indictment on their legal representatives one of which I believe - but will stand corrected - was Jonathon Cohen QC who himself has just been made a judge. If I'm right or wrong in this assumption some legal representative should have known as was pointed out by Recorder Campbell, the evidence collected in Germany would more than likely not be admissable in a UK court of law.

It also appears that this band of rogues hadn't done their homework as it was pointed out in court it was debateable that GoldenEye owned their own "Work", and thats only one example.

Astonishing.

All in all it appears Virgin and Mr Recorder Campbell are not impressed by any of the applicants ability to bring an application for an NPO, especially the sacked disgraced ex-cop and his involvment.

One thing is patently obvious. The present cohort of applicants haven't let down their predecesors in as much as maintaining complete incompetence, but with maybe one important exception, none of the current "Scamsters" have made or signed a statement of truth which appeared to concern Recorder Campbell greatly, as it should. Although as the old adage informs us "Truth has no place in a court of law", which is difficult to dispute.

Oh, and many thanks to Mullard47. Great work.
Stressed_Out
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:19 am

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby MrFredPFL » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:28 pm

User avatar
MrFredPFL
 
Posts: 15678
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:48 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Stressed_Out » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:42 am

On a lighter note I found this article of interest while looking for something completely different.

It made me smile to compare Symantec's calculus of cost's to that of Goldneye in respect to trolling.
Methinks Goldeye mathematicians should revise their methods or go back to school - the extortionists.

Laughable :)

https://www.computerworlduk.com/it-vend ... als-16524/
Stressed_Out
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:19 am

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Hickster » Tue Jul 23, 2019 4:53 am

:lookup: Oh BRILLIANT, the Law is slow, but it does grind very finely.

Well done chaps, can we say that is the smell of VICTORY, and all go home now? (It has been like 10 years now)
Please feel free to email me at:
acs.bore@gmail.com

Read the BLOG Here
http://acsbore.wordpress.com

Faceless Keyboard Warrior
User avatar
Hickster
Faceless Keyboard Warrior
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 2:25 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Hickster » Tue Jul 23, 2019 4:56 am

Sorry for the Double-Post, just a reminder, IF anyone wants me, just post a message on the board, to say, Check you email, or Check DM, that way I will be a bit quicker. I apologise to those who I have taken too long to get back to.
Please feel free to email me at:
acs.bore@gmail.com

Read the BLOG Here
http://acsbore.wordpress.com

Faceless Keyboard Warrior
User avatar
Hickster
Faceless Keyboard Warrior
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 2:25 pm

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Stressed_Out » Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:23 am

Wow! Has this been mentioned before? From Web Pirate to A** Pirate.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1505798/?r ... flmg_slf_1

Love the title, especially the hint that someone has shoved a re-hot poker - or maybe something else - a throbbing **** maybe up Dovers ass.

If this is right Julian can brag instead of lying to his mum now. After all he is a Hollywood errr! whatever now.
Stressed_Out
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:19 am

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby bpaw » Fri Aug 02, 2019 4:05 pm

Hi Stressed

Yes, Mullard the ever vigilant posted it before HERE.

The problem with Lyndsay is he owes his success through his persona. Try to criticise his behaviour is pointless because it increases his attraction with those who seek a certain entertainment which he provides. Gonzo.

In the past, we have only focused on his criminal behaviour such as:

https://acsbore.wordpress.com/2014/05/25/golden-eye-international-limited-no-comment/

Police statement:
Mr Honey, I’am satisfied with the documents in Police possession together with the observation on the premises at <-snip-> that you have a responsibility in the running of Videx Ltd and in addition having viewed the ‘Videx Video Show’ that you are aware of the contents of that video and as such you will be charged with the offences under the Obscene Publications Act and under the Protection of Children Act and again I remind you of the caution, that is formally telling you of what you are going to be charged with.

Naked children included in a porno film is not attractive.

Anyway, on a lighter note!

https://warrens.law

URGENT ANNOUNCEMENT
Please be advised that at 15:44 on 26 April 2019, Andrew Hosking and Sean Bucknall, both of Quantuma LLP, were appointed Joint Administrators of Rodney Warren & Co Ltd (in Administration) (“Warrens Law”).

Andrew Crossley! Oh dear!

https://warrens.law/our-legal-team/andrew-crossley/

No mention of the children in your bio, but administration!

Well Mr Crossley, you will be well qualified to aid in a law practice going down the pan!
"Hatton & Berkeley, which provides financial services to small businesses, sent the letters on behalf of its client TCYK LLC to Mrs Drew. Robert Croucher, managing director of Hatton & Berkeley, said: "They [the letters] are part of what's referred to as a pre-action protocol. We send them before action...They don't actually make a demand for money."
Source Link: BBC News
bpaw
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: ACS:Law leaked spreadsheet

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Stressed_Out » Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:58 am

@bpaw

Thanks for the info on that mate . Should have known nothing much gets past Mullard.
Stressed_Out
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:19 am

Re: Golden Eye Int LTD / GEIL / MIRCOM / TCYK Threat Discuss

Postby Mullard47 » Sun Aug 04, 2019 9:35 am

Stressed_Out wrote:@bpaw

Thanks for the info on that mate . Should have known nothing much gets past Mullard.


Actually, and as regards the demise of Warrens, they also had a department specialising in a particular field of work.

The page there referring to AJC is at

http://elderabuse-lawyers.co.uk/our-leg ... -crossley/

I suppose a cynic would question the exact nature of their work, and whether it had anything to do with the films involving participants that, at the time, were described by some as "Bowden's Grannies".

Also, my recollection is that Digiprotect who were involved with the "expert evidence" at the time subsequently became insolvent, and NG3 Systems Ltd was dissolved last year even though they still appear to have a web site.
Mullard47
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 1:59 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Torrent Download Court Action Threat/Settlement Letter Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

© 2001-2008 Slyck.com