






I think I remember something similar when I was 11 or 12.
IceCube wrote: As far as I can tell, the lawyer was the one that told the other ARIA associates to not show up, so they didn't.
brengarne wrote:The ARAI technical people might not have been involved in or aware of the decision but there would definately have been a detailed discussions between the laywer(s) and the ARIA Executives, and certainly involving the RIAA and others as this is a landmark case


Wham wrote:Good article Slyck! Quite incredible. It only makes me stop and think that the entire music industry hasn't got a clue as to what they are doing.
I think the lawyers do. Lets face it, the longer this plays out the more money they make. Wow, the lawyers are laughing at everybody.
SlyckScratch wrote:The ARIA have already decided if they want Kazaa to live or die. Whats the good of a meeting to sort things out if you don't want to sort anything out?
STATEMENT FROM SHARMAN NETWORKS
November 25, 2005
Record company lawyer shoots himself in the foot
The Australian Federal Court yesterday granted Kazaa a reprieve after hearing that the record companies' lawyers had walked away from the court-ordered technical process. (1)
During the hearing Justice Wilcox indicated that he was "extremely angry" with Mr Michael Williams' treatment of a Federal Court official overseeing the technical process.
Justice Wilcox indicated that Mr Williams had "shot himself in the foot" by aborting the court-ordered process.
A first technical meeting had been held with considerable success, with Kazaa seeing this as the first step towards establishing a business that would gain from the record companies the licenses it had always wanted.
Kazaa was granted an extension to deal with the technical issues until late February 2006, despite objections by the record companies.
The court also rejected, out of hand, an attempt by the record companies to obtain damages after their barrister indicated that he would be seeking $200 m.
A spokesperson for Sharman said the action of the record companies in rejecting the court ordered meeting reveals their true intention is not to foster legitimate business as envisaged by the court, but to shut down Kazaa and rid themselves improperly of a competitor.
As a result of yesterday's rejection by the Court of the record companies' submission, consumers will be able to enjoy the Kazaa experience at least until the appeal is held, in late February 2006.
For more information, please contact:
Julie Fenwick, ICON International Communications
+61 2 8235 7600 (work)
+61 423 174 424 (mobile)
julie.fenwick@iicpr.com
(1) The court in handing down its judgement on 5 September 2005 made a landmark ruling ensuring the survival of Kazaa by recognising that its legitimate business should be protected and afforded the opportunity of a time frame in which parties could agree to a protocol. This operating protocol was to be agreed between the parties. This would allow the respondents to adjust their operations so that they could continue.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests