Slyck.com
 
Slyck Chatbox - And More

SnoCap Signs Warner Music

Discuss Slyck's latest news
Forum rules
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Slyck Forum Rules

SnoCap Signs Warner Music

Postby SlyckTom » Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:45 pm

As much a the four big music labels may wish to simply ignore P2P networks and hope they go away, they simply can't. With P2P activity at an all time high, record labels are realizing the market that thrives beneath this activity, and are anxious to tap into this potential.

Taking advantage of this potential is another matter. P2P and file-sharing networks are akin to a modern day wild west, with little in the way of a governing body to regulate activity. This had lead to an explosion of bandwidth activity that CacheLogic estimates may consume up to 80% of some ISPs traffic.

To counter this unregulated activity, networks have been built on top of existing networks to trade licensed material. Altnet is a prime example of this. Constructed to "piggy back" FastTrack, Altnet provides Kazaa users the choice to buy licensed material. The theory is, content owners would distribute their work via Altnet with the hope that Kazaa users will opt to purchase licensed material.

The success and future of this project can be best described as limited. Altnet, which is owned by Brilliant Digital Entertainment, is also finding itself in equally hot water as Sharman Networks. In September 2005, Judge Murray Wilcox lumped Altnet together with Sharman Networks in his disfavorable <a href=http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=900 target=_blank>ruling</a>. Judge Wilcox found Altnet "authorized users to infringe the applicants’ copyright" because: the relationship with Sharman was considered a 'joint enterprise', and, Altnet helped design Sharman's infringement-encouraging website.

While Alnet's situation is currently marred with litigation, SnoCap has been considerably more successful.

In many ways, SnoCap is virtually identical to Altnet. Both provide license holders a method for distributing files and both provide payment architectures.

However in terms of flexibility, SnoCap shows its advantage. Alnet is currently limited to FastTrack, while SnoCap can be applied to any P2P network (which also avoids guilt by association.) Also, SnoCap is not a P2P network like Altnet. It utilizes existing P2P networks for content holders to distribute their work, which alleviates the dependence on a single network.

By avoiding the instability associated with FastTrack, or any troubled network, SnoCap has quickly amassed a large following of independent and RIAA member music labels. Today, SnoCap announced the addition of Warner Music Group to its growing customer list.

"With WMG as an ally, our vision for expanding the digital music marketplace just got one giant step closer to reality," said Shawn Fanning, SNOCAP's Founder. "With the music of all four majors and our ongoing effort to add indies and individual artists, we can turn our full attention on helping new services reach consumers with the depth and breadth of content that they don't have legitimate access to now."

The most likely avenues for content holders to distribute their work will be industry-approved applications such as iMesh and MashBoxx. One of the major problems with pay P2P was the lack content. With all four major labels on board, this situation may be resolved at least for mainstream customers. Now the major challenge is actually getting people to pay as iTunes and other similar services are reporting stagnant download purchases.
Follow us on Twitter @SlyckDotCom
Join our Facebook Fan page
SlyckTom
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:22 pm
Location: New York City

Postby zbeast » Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:15 pm

So, I still dont know how this works.
Is this another one of those "fakes" file injection systems. You know the ones. you download a file but when you click on it it tells you that you have to pay to use the file.
zbeast
 
Posts: 6783
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: Behind that itch. yes, that one right there.

Postby Anonymous » Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:30 pm

I want to hear more about "iTunes reporting stagnant sales".

What is going on there? All I hear is glowing reviews of how well iTunes is doing.
Anonymous
 

Postby SlyckTom » Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:32 pm

Follow us on Twitter @SlyckDotCom
Join our Facebook Fan page
SlyckTom
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:22 pm
Location: New York City

Postby AussieMatt » Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:45 pm

Digital Music isnt where the money is to be made in the Digital content industry epecialy when one song costs 99c and a large percentage of the song price goes to the record company.

Games and Movies is where the real money will be made and advertising revene from IPTV .Games cost bettween $10 to $70 and movies will cost about $10 to $20 depending on the encoding quality(High Def vs DivX) and age of the movie.Special editions and "box sets" will cost more.

Music will be just an enticement once the services deliver games ,software and video online .
AussieMatt
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:03 am

Postby IceCube » Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:09 pm

AussieMatt wrote:one song costs 99c and a large percentage of the song price goes to the record company.


70% or more if I remember correctly.
User avatar
IceCube
 
Posts: 17079
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:31 pm
Location: Igloo Country?


Return to Slyck News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron
© 2001-2008 Slyck.com