Guys we clearly don't agree on anything here and I'm not interested in proving anything more to you..
Besides everything I have already stated , the illegal DDoS attacks on our site were taken quite seriously and cannot be ignored..These actions are under further investigation.
We can only assume that the widespread trash talk about our site is part 2 of the plan by someone in your groups attempt to take us out, and justify those actions by passing the blame, anyway they can, for whatever twisted reasons they may have.
There is no place on the internet for any groups who actively engage in malicious activities/attacks against any other sites, or any sympathy for the people who blindly support those activities.
Thanks for visiting , you are more than welcome to discuss any other topics on our forum, but this subject is now closed as will any other related new threads on this.
Our decision will not be reversed, no matter how many DDoS attacks , lies, threats and abusive comments are launched against us.
perhaps we're not living on the same planet as those millions upon millions upon millions of unfortunate souls who can't use P2P and apparently can't tell us about it either..
The accusation is that it was somehow wrong to not split that range on command, putting the convenience of one tiny site above the security of everyone else who doesn't use WinMX.
A few people incidentally blocked over a period of several years does not surely imply many more right now, does it? In fact, if we were able to see all of them there would probably be very few overall and virtually none who couldn't get past it in short order. You had no problem helping people connect to you when they were blocked, didn't you?aaron, i have been involved with p2p for many years. over that period of time, i have personally seen lots of filesharers blocked by these blocklists. has it been millions? of course not, but i have no way of knowing how many it is. i think it's a safe assumption that if i have personally seen dozens, there are many more.
What can you tell me about the physical server currently assigned to that site? Can you, or even the people who rented it, tell me exactly what that server consists of and name the other customers and software sharing that server. Can anybody guarantee that the owner of that server, a massive media company which actively and loudly hates all P2P in general, has never or will never do anything like snoop on it's traffic or use other virtual servers on the same IP address to launch their own peers on networks the WinMX users aren't involved in? Are you willing to trust that undeniably hostile company with your own P2P traffic?please forgive me, but this statement seems... odd to me. let's say the ip is removed from the list. if a person does NOT use winmx, how exactly does the removal of that ip from the list put them at risk?
A few people incidentally blocked over a period of several years does not surely imply many more right now, does it?
Ross Wheeler, CEO of Albury.net.au, referring to the Australian Governments internet filtering plan wrote:"It's the most ill-conceived pile of stupidity by the biggest bunch of cretins that I've ever seen in my life"
Moore wrote:accusing us of everything short of murder [ or was that in there somewhere ? ]
We do our best block all known anti-p2p related companies thoroughly.
We list all similar known companies/individuals that are actively working against users of filesharing networks, a comprehensive list of these kinds of companies can be found on our forum in the anti-p2p research section for registered members only.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest