by johngalt » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:12 pm
Interesting take on this ST.
I use a Messenger enhancement called MessengerPlus - a while back the dev, Patchou, decided to partner with lop.com to offset his costs and still provide a free product to the masses. There was much consternation, and some backlash as initially the installation process had it defaulted to install the lop.com Malware, but it was *easily* opted out of - and I say the same thing, that since there is an opt out mechanism, there is no reason to label it as spyware.
Just to give you and idea, Micro$oft AntiSPyware labels Messenger plus *itself* as spyware and attempts to remove it - I finally had force M$ AS to ignore messenger plus altogether.
A popular site for hosts files to block Malware sites has a list of over 30,000 sites - many of which cannot be justified as true *malicious* sites, b/c there is no drive by installations, no Malware introduced to an end users system, nothing at all except a little advertisement that end users think they are entitled to not have to see. But when I asked why messenger plus' home page was included, I was told that they were affiliated with spyware, and that automatically made them a rogue site in the maintainer's book. I have since stopped using that product and stopped visiting the site regularly.
Now another product is causing havoc on my machine - regardless of what folks say, I like DAP as my DLM b/c the feature set is rivaled, in my opinion, only by other commercial / shareware products - and of all the ones I tried, I liked DAP the best. I bough DAP 5, and more recently purchased the DAP 7 upgrade, but since I brought SAV 10 CE home from work, I found out that the new SAV doesn't play nice at all. I have marked the DAP folder as off limits to both real time scanning as well as in regular manual / automatic scans, and yet it still finds the dapbho.dll, quarantines it, and 'fixes' about 100 references to DAP in the registry (or, at least that is what is indicated by the quarantine message) - and an attempt at restoring DAP on fixes is partially, to the point where i have to re-install DAP. Added to that horror is the fact that now SpeedBit think I am using a pirated key and has locked access to my attempts to register the last time I installed it (last night) _ all because SAV keeps marking the gd dll as spyware and quarantining it.
The worst part is that on the Symantec web page dedicated to 'DAP.Adware', it acknowledges that the adware is only in the unregistered version, and yet SAV finds the .dll even though I have a legitimately registered version ***AND*** I have told it to not go looking int the DAP folder.
My point in all of this is that just because a program says something is spyware does not make it so. Programs are not perfect - and C|Net was stupid to start removing products from their inventory before conducting a full and thorough analysis on the program to determine the *true* maliciousness / lack there of of that particular file.
Also, when you run multiple products and some products find stuff that others do not, it is not *automatically* because one product is better than another - it could also be a difference in the rule set used to determine the maliciousness of a file, and it could also be that the program has a tendency to find false positives a lot.
Interested in alternatives to Micro$oft? Visit our
Alternative OS Forum. Also, check out our exclusive interviews (
FREE membership required!!!) |
GrabIt ßeta Tester and Shemes.com
forum mod