Slyck.com
 
Slyck Chatbox - And More

About WinMX 4.0

Discussion about the WinMX program/network
Forum rules
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Slyck Forum Rules

Postby Widdle » Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:21 pm

The best place to patch your MX is not http://www.winmxgroup.com as sumfuka would note. That site and the site of the other "fix" only give you one option and a very slanted view of the benefits and caveats of both. The best place to go is a neutral territory site that offers all current fixes for you to try on your own and see which works better.

http://www.WinMXisBack.com
User avatar
Widdle
 
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 10:17 am
Location: Sherwood Forest

WinMX 4

Postby chuck » Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:37 pm

Widdle
Isnt that snips site?
how can that be neutral territory when he is part of the pie team? I agree on everyone needs to be neutral but to say that a member of eaither team is neutral is a little misleading.
chuck
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:23 pm

Postby sumfuka » Sun Oct 30, 2005 4:21 pm

Widdle wrote:The best place to patch your MX is not http://www.winmxgroup.com as sumfuka would note. That site and the site of the other "fix" only give you one option and a very slanted view of the benefits and caveats of both. The best place to go is a neutral territory site that offers all current fixes for you to try on your own and see which works better.

http://www.WinMXisBack.com


Widdle, what exactly does the http://winmxgroup.com/ site do or say that you find so biased? It is, to me, just one of many methods of tackling the problem of getting users reconnected with a minimum of hassle. I don't give a shit about 'this side' and 'that side'; I simply chose to recommend that particular method because: (a) It is very simple for a user to implement, (b) handles tasks that users may otherwise find difficult and confusing to maintain manually (the blocking of 'bad' addresses), and (c) contains the necessary client that charismeincalif requires in order to get back online.

You're already showing signs of bias yourself as to what YOU consider 'neutral' by dismissing my views in exchange for your own. How about you, instead, offer the user some alternative solutions than what I have recommended without your own bias thrown in as to what 'the best place to patch' is?
sumfuka
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:42 am

Postby P2P_G » Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:28 pm

I downloaded WinMX from: http://winmxgroup.com/ and it connected to the WinMX network whitout the patch :) its good and much better than kazaa! but I'm stuk whit gnutella hehe :)
Piracy Will Never Die.
User avatar
P2P_G
 
Posts: 2783
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:27 pm

Postby tm, » Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:38 pm

The next-generation WinMX is not dead yet. Now that the WinMX-compatible client WinZO is open-source, this project has the potential to eventually become the equivalent of the next "4.0" release.

Its main drawback is that see-sharp and dot-net are not popular among the open-source crowd.
tm,
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:23 am

Postby P2P_G » Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:03 pm

I like WinMx( http://winmxgroup.com ) more than gnutella now, there are not many users on this network, it needs to grow more so it will have rare mp3s ;)
Piracy Will Never Die.
User avatar
P2P_G
 
Posts: 2783
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:27 pm

Postby OmegaGreg » Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:16 pm

Hmm, why are we reviving this?
User avatar
OmegaGreg
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 2:55 am
Location: USA

Postby yaveznodo » Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:31 pm

I think it's P2P_G, he's the forum archaelogist :)
User avatar
yaveznodo
 
Posts: 1511
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 2:29 am
Location: Dark Paradise

Previous

Return to WinMX

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

© 2001-2008 Slyck.com